December 24, 2024
2 min learn
Wikipedia Searches Reveal Differing Kinds of Curiosity
Are you a “hunter” or a “busybody”?
The web site Wikipedia describes curiosity as a “quality related to inquisitive thinking, such as exploration, investigation, and learning, evident in humans and other animals.” However there’s much more to this prime motivator for a lot of human conduct—and Wikipedia, because the world’s largest encyclopedia, is now serving to social scientists deepen the definition of curiosity.
Tracing how Wikipedia searchers flit amongst subjects and lose themselves in Wiki rabbit holes revealed three totally different types of human inquisitiveness: the “busybody,” the “hunter” and the “dancer.”
“Curiosity actually works by connecting pieces of information, not just acquiring them.” —Dani Bassett, College of Pennsylvania
On supporting science journalism
In case you’re having fun with this text, contemplate supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales in regards to the discoveries and concepts shaping our world immediately.
On this lexicon, a busybody traces a zigzagging route by means of many typically distantly associated subjects. A hunter, in distinction, searches with sustained focus, transferring amongst a comparatively small variety of carefully associated articles. A dancer hyperlinks collectively extremely disparate subjects to attempt to synthesize new concepts. “Curiosity actually works by connecting pieces of information, not just acquiring them,” says College of Pennsylvania community scientist Dani Bassett, cosenior writer on a current examine of those curiosity varieties in Science Advances. “It’s not as if we go through the world and pick up a piece of information and put it in our pockets like a stone. Instead we gather information and connect it to stuff that we already know.”
The workforce tracked greater than 482,000 individuals utilizing Wikipedia’s cell app in 50 nations or territories and 14 languages. The researchers charted these customers’ paths utilizing “knowledge networks” of related data, which depict how carefully one search subject (a node within the community) is said to a different. Past simply mapping the connections, they linked curiosity types to location-based indicators of well-being, inequality, and different measures.
In nations with greater training ranges and better gender equality, individuals browsed extra like busybodies. In nations with decrease scores on these variables, individuals browsed like hunters. Bassett hypothesizes that “in countries that have more structures of oppression or patriarchal forces, there may be a constraining of knowledge production that pushes people more toward this hyperfocus.” The researchers additionally analyzed subjects of curiosity, starting from physics to visible arts, for busybodies in contrast with hunters (graphic). Dancer patterns, extra just lately confirmed, have been excluded.
Princeton College psychologist Erik Nook praised the examine’s “dazzlingly large” scope. The authors, he says, introduced collectively experience from a variety of fields—topology, psychology, cognitive science, affective science, scientific science, sociology and computational modeling—to disclose a “host of insights into human behavior.”
The seeds of this work have been planted in 2016 when Bassett and their twin brother, Perry Zurn, a professor of philosophy at American College, seen that loads of tutorial analysis had examined creativity—however comparatively little had gone to its requisite precursor, curiosity. Zurn emerged from a deep dive into 2,000 years of Western historic and philosophical literature with descriptions of varied curiosity types, together with the three investigated within the current paper. Wikipedia then supplied the real-world take a look at mattress to substantiate this busybody-hunter-dancer typology, drawn from the work of philosophical greats. Heidegger and Nietzsche might by no means have imagined that their work would sooner or later affect the community science of Wiki rabbit holes.
