Ref Watch: Dermot Gallagher assesses Premier League incidents at Bournemouth, Liverpool, Manchester United and extra | Soccer Information

Former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher is again to evaluate the controversial moments from the weekend’s motion – plus have your say on the main incidents…

Ought to Ouattara ‘purpose’ have stood?

INCIDENT: Bournemouth denied a stoppage-time winner towards Newcastle. The Cherries thought they’d snatched a 2-1 victory when Dango Ouattara outjumped the visiting defence from a nook to information the ball into the online.

Referee David Coote awarded the purpose however VAR Tim Robinson determined it was handball, regardless of replays seeming to point out the ball legitimately got here off Ouattara’s shoulder.

DERMOT SAYS: “It raises a lot of points in so much as everyone seems happy with the goal. Everyone expects a goal. When it went to VAR and they said they were checking for handball, I never thought it would have been overturned.

“They fed again from the VAR that it was a factual resolution. I believe it is contradictory because the VAR thought it was low sufficient to provide a handball. I used to be a referee and thought it was excessive sufficient to not give a handball so it’s subjective.

“I think there’s a lot of people who are going to be in my camp and not the VAR’s. Many people will disagree.”

SUE SMITH SAYS: “I questioned if the principles had modified as I watched it a few occasions and thought the ball hit the participant’s shoulder. There was little doubt in my thoughts.

“Some people say that if it’s not conclusive then the goal should stand. I feel for David Coote as he gave the goal but it was the VAR who was wrong.”

Ought to Joelinton have been despatched off?

INCIDENT: Newcastle midfielder Joelinton escaped with solely a yellow card in stoppage time when he prevented Neto from taking a fast throw by placing his arm across the goalkeeper’s head.

DERMOT SAYS: “I think in no way shape or form is this a red card. If you look at it, his intention is purely to delay the goalkeeper [Neto] from getting that ball up the pitch on the counter-attack.

“It appears worse as a result of the goalkeeper is shifting however in case you look rigorously, he grabs the goalkeeper by the chest – not the throat or the face.”

Ought to Garnacho ‘purpose’ have stood?

INCIDENT: Manchester United striker Joshua Zirkzee inadvertently stopped his facet from taking the lead through the second half at Brighton.

DERMOT SAYS: “It’s unfortunate but [Zirkzee] is sliding in to try and score. There’s no doubt about that as it’s his job and his instinct.

“He does contact the ball from an offside place. It is clearly offside, it strikes his knee and goes in. His response tells you… he is aware of instantly.

“It hits him before it goes into the net. It would have stood had it struck him after the ball had crossed the line.”

Ought to Jota have been despatched off?

INCIDENT: Early within the second half, Jota averted even a yellow card after showing to catch Nathan Collins along with his arm throughout Liverpool’s 2-0 win over Brentford on Tremendous Sunday.

DERMOT SAYS: “It’s certainly not a red card for me. He does raise his arm and it’s a flailing arm, and he does catch Nathan but it’s such a short distance and he doesn’t use it as a weapon. He also catches him at the back of his head. It’s not nice. It’s possibly a yellow card but not a red for me.”

Ought to Leicester leveller have been chalked off?

INCIDENT: Wout Faes purpose initially dominated out for offside, earlier than referee Darren Bond was despatched to the monitor and deemed Jamie Vardy to haven’t interfered with Bernd Leno’s efforts to make a save.

DERMOT SAYS: “It’s excellent work from the VAR. When you see it, [Vardy] clearly plays no part in the incident. He’s peeling away and plays no part. It’s a good header for the goal and VAR has on this occasion done a massive service for the game.

“The referee was led brilliantly by VAR Jarred Gillett.”

Was penalty call at Man City correct?

INCIDENT: Ipswich’s Leif Davis appeared to have got away with a challenge on Manchester City forward Savinho, but VAR David Coote sent referee Sam Allison to the pitchside monitor, and he awarded a penalty.

DERMOT SAYS: “It is a good use of VAR. I believe it is a foul as he does not get the ball. He dangles his leg. Savinho strikes the ball and he’s caught. The referee solely wanted one look to provide it.

“For me, it is a clear and obvious error. I only have to see it once to see it’s a penalty.”

STEPHEN WARNOCK SAYS: “For me, it’s just the re-refereeing of the game. It was seen as a clear and obvious error. The referee thought on the field that it was just a coming together.

“We’ll now see this creep in additional. This was the primary actual one the place they’ve overturned the choice after a few weeks the place we noticed extra issues being let go.

“For me, that is a penalty.”

Was Mosquera fortunate to not be despatched off?

INCIDENT: Wolves defender Yerson Mosquera was solely proven a yellow card for a reckless problem on Chelsea midfielder Moises Caicedo.

DERMOT SAYS: “For me, all this could have been avoided as there has to be a foul given against Marc Cucurella on the edge of the box. If you gave a foul there, then what followed wouldn’t have happened.

“I believe it is not a pink card. The referee has handled it moderately properly. In his defence, this form of stuff was happening all sport.”

SUE SMITH SAYS: “For me, it is not a pink card. The studs are low and he is going for the ball.”