Truly, no — however maybe a quick meals nation in recession. In arguing that output is mismeasured, a lot so we’ve been in recession for the previous 4 years, Peter St. Onge (Heritage) and Jeffrey Tucker (Brownstone Institute) write:
Varied research have proven that since 2019 quick meals costs — a gold commonplace in monetary markets for measuring true inflation — have outpaced official CPI by between 25% and 50%.
The “various studies” cited are so far as I can inform a set of newspaper articles. What if we measure GDP utilizing quick meals costs? Right here’s the evolution of the quick meals (“limited service restaurants”) element of the CPI, as in comparison with the GDP deflator, the CPI, and the meals away from house element of the CPI:
Determine 1: GDP deflator (black), CPI (blue), meals away from house CPI (brown), meals away from house – restricted service eating places CPI (tan), Large Mac value (inexperienced), all in logs 2017M01=0. Large Mac costs based mostly on value as near 12 months mid-point as attainable. NBER outlined peak-to-trough recession dates shaded grey. Supply: SPGMI (Macroeconomic Advisers/IHS-Markit) 8/1 launch, BLS by way of FRED, BLS, Economist, NBER, and writer’s calculations.
Some dialogue of quick meals retailer costs right here). My most well-liked measure is the Large MacTM, which is utilized in many research of buying energy parity (together with one printed in Financial Journal).
It’s true that utilizing the restricted companies restaurant value index, costs have risen sooner than the CPI (though the identical shouldn’t be true for Large MacTMs!).
I plot the totally different measures of GDP over the identical interval plotted by St.Onge and Antoni.
Determine 2: GDP in bn.Ch.2017$ (black), in bn.BigMac2017$ (inexperienced), in bn. bundles of restaurant meals 2017$ (tan), all SAAR. Large MacTM costs interpolated (cubic) from annual July observations. Supply: BEA 2024Q2 2nd launch, BLS, Economist, and writer’s calculations.
Utilizing Large MacTM costs, actual GDP has been falling since end-2022, albeit from a better stage than GDP measured in Ch.2017$. Utilizing the food-away-from-home restricted companies element of the CPI, we now have an image barely extra consistent with the St. Onge-Tucker thesis.
So…if all we consumed, invested in, paid troopers and civil servants, and exported was burgers, sandwiches, fried rooster and tacos, then certainly we would have been in a recession for the previous 4 years. (Quick meals has a 2.5% weight within the CPI-U, so assuming consumption is 70% of GDP, then quick meals consumption accounts for about 1.8% of GDP.)